x64

Bugs and issues - current donor version.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Marek
Author
Author
Posts: 3976
Joined: 10.04.2006, 09:48
Location: Germany
Contact:

x64

#1 Post by Marek » 04.01.2014, 14:14

It would be nice to know too, if someone use the x64 version and has no bugs/problems :).

joby_toss
Posts: 1345
Joined: 22.07.2009, 21:19
Location: Romania
Contact:

Re: x64

#2 Post by joby_toss » 04.01.2014, 15:16

I use it and only it, from the first minute you made it available! No real problem so far! 8)

User avatar
alf5000
Posts: 552
Joined: 12.04.2012, 17:59
Location: Austria

Re: x64

#3 Post by alf5000 » 04.01.2014, 17:54

I use it exclusively.
If I find a problem I recheck with FCXEx32.
Mostly FCXEx32 has the same glitches as FCXEx64.

As far as I can tell FCXEx64 does a superb job.
Thank you, Marek.
Last edited by alf5000 on 05.01.2014, 10:19, edited 1 time in total.
(win10pro x64) - (latest FCXE x64 portable)

User avatar
ralfso
Posts: 812
Joined: 31.10.2007, 18:21
Location: Gifhorn, Germany

Re: x64

#4 Post by ralfso » 04.01.2014, 21:23

I also didn't notice any problems with the FCXE64.
I started FCXE64 with the settings from the 32bit version in its own directory.
Regards
Ralf

Win10 (64-bit), Intel i7-2600 (3,4 GHz), 8 GB Ram, 500 GB SSD, 2x2000 GB HD, NVIDIA GeForce 545

HansDampf
Posts: 3
Joined: 27.08.2013, 19:07

Re: x64

#5 Post by HansDampf » 05.01.2014, 17:32

I switched to x64 completely, no problems so far.
It's really a great tool.

There is one question i want to ask: FC displays special directories with their "real" names, e.g. "c:\users";
The Windows Explorer displays their lokalized names, in my case its german "c:\Benutzer".
Is it possible to make FC behave like the Explorer?

R(i)SK
Posts: 1
Joined: 18.03.2010, 14:21

Re: x64

#6 Post by R(i)SK » 18.01.2014, 12:53

I'm also using the x64 version and can only tell you, taht is works flawlessly and much faster, than the x86 version. Especially the network drives are accessed much faster! Thumbs up! :D

horst.epp
Posts: 460
Joined: 15.11.2008, 20:18

Re: x64

#7 Post by horst.epp » 19.01.2014, 17:05

I use the x64 version only and I'm very satisfied with it.
No major problems found so far.
What I don't like is the automatic setting of ACLs for my user account
if I try to enter a protected dir.
It should offer to open it as administrator (with UAC enabled) and not set an ACL.

DG
Posts: 57
Joined: 11.10.2007, 02:39
Location: US

Re: x64

#8 Post by DG » 22.01.2014, 00:49

I have been using x64 for about a week now both at home and work, and have had no problems. I also have noticed it's faster than the x32 version.

Regards,
DG

Zorkoff
Posts: 125
Joined: 10.05.2011, 23:14
Location: Boston, MA

Re: x64

#9 Post by Zorkoff » 22.01.2014, 22:41

I have been using FCXE-652x64 for about a week now and it seems faster and just as stable as the x32 version. I now use the x64 version as my primary file manager.

The x64 version also eliminates the tray icon for FCcontextmenu64 - Good!

I have only found minor problems which are in both versions, so I reported them in the regular bug report forum.

I can only say "Thank You Marek" your efforts are very much appreciated. FreeCommander is the best full featured file manager available. Years back, I was a fan of PowerDesk, but FreeCommander has surpassed everything it provided and is much faster as well.

jimmy42
Posts: 1
Joined: 24.01.2014, 05:08

Re: x64

#10 Post by jimmy42 » 24.01.2014, 05:23

I have used x64 version on an Acer Netbook AO756 with x64 Windows 8.1 with 8gb ram. Love this version. Very quick with no problems. I am also a Donor and not regretted the Donation Ever...
Thanks Marek for Your Hard Work!!!

rickowen
Posts: 2
Joined: 22.04.2011, 01:49

Re: x64

#11 Post by rickowen » 24.01.2014, 16:06

I have used it regularly (>20 times per day) since it was posted for review. It has been rock solid for me. I use it to copy from / to network shares, USB devices (including my phone), and local drives. No problems to report.

User avatar
bege
Posts: 54
Joined: 14.09.2010, 02:23
Location: Germany

Re: x64

#12 Post by bege » 27.01.2014, 13:58

I use the x64 version from the beginning. I haven't found any bugs that are not also in the x86 version. Since you supply the x64 I only use the x86 version to check when I find bugs.
Thank you.

Ivkosky
Posts: 22
Joined: 06.03.2013, 12:09

Re: x64

#13 Post by Ivkosky » 02.10.2014, 07:27

I switched to x64 just yesterday, set it up in a same way as my x86 and I have not experienced any x64-specific issues so far - well done! I was quite surprised, because I didn't really expect such a tiny program to be really impacted by x64 architecture, but it seems to be much quicker!

Also, the only annoying thing in x86 version is the additional program which creates an icon in the task bar when I right-click to get properties of folders/files in my Windows 7 Professional 64 bit. This is now obviously gone with x64! :)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 37 guests